on Swords
For obvious reasons, I am no fan of katana-fetishisation, and I know nothing much about European swords or swordsmanship, but the credibility of the passage you quoted is blown out of the water, piled up on shore, dried out and burned to ashes by this piece of ahistorical drivel:
Fourth: The Katana did not evolve. They came up with one design and never changed it for thousands of years, not once. The design process of the longsword is well documented, it went through thousands of permutations and redesigns to make it more efficient, more useful and more adaptable.
Not all Japanese swords are katana. Not even all Japanese swords that look like katana, to the untutored fanboy eye, are katana. The katana was a fairly late development in Japanese sword design, not "thousands of years" old, and its design varied over time in response to its very busy users' needs. Essentially the quoted passage is simply the mirror-image of ignorant katana fetishisation.
Ninth: Stop idealising other cultures because they’re over there.
Because it is much better to piss on other cultures without taking the trouble to learn about them, right?