Topic: Re: POINTLESS THREAD IIa: ESCAPE FROM RAPTOR MOUNTAIN (Read 261893 times)

Alex C · « **Reply #2051 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 11:37 »

Quote from: Masterbainter on 04 Nov 2009, 01:30

Probably going to get super flamed by the Rugby peeps.

Every time I see a rugby game I'm pretty thankful that their rules penalize blocking and thus all-around athleticism is generally more valued than fitting the particular physical ideal of a given position like in American football. Position specialization is exactly how you end up with 5'11" 180 pound wide receivers trying to turn the corner on an end around only to get pasted by a 6'4" 280 pound defensive end. Without helmets such an occurrence would be an outright disaster waiting to happen. It's painful enough watching old clips of Jonah Lomu running people over as it is.

Caleb · « **Reply #2052 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 12:29 »

glyphic · « **Reply #2053 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 13:00 »

Caleb · « **Reply #2054 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 13:02 »

Even if that dog had the thumbs to operate that Glock it would take him FOREVER to get that thing out of the holster.

The hawk is ready to go.

Come on glyphic! Use your head man!

Blue Kitty · « **Reply #2055 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 13:05 »

Yeah, he's dead

I don't understand the fetish some people have for Chun Li's legs

glyphic · « **Reply #2056 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 13:11 »

I don't understand her left breast in that picture.

LeeC · « **Reply #2057 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 13:26 »

I think I understand why, but i dont get it.

Dliessmgg · « **Reply #2058 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 13:31 »

Her left breast is the one directly below her face. The other one is almost always hidden by the other girl's leg.

Quote from: David_Dovey on 04 Nov 2009, 05:11

Sorry dogg, Slamball

That wouldn't look half as awesome with that music.

Alex C · « **Reply #2059 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 14:18 »

That Rorschach could be considered Chaotic Good when interpreted to the letter is part of why the alignment system never worked too well. He flouts society's conventions, and thus doesn't really fit the Lawful Neutral template, but he only does so because society doesn't adhere as strictly to rigid principles as he does; he's actually quite bereft of compassion and he values his principles more than he values human life. He's Chaotic Good only by dint of being too Lawful Neutral to fit in with anyone else.

JD · « **Reply #2060 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 15:45 »

Quote from: Blue Kitty on 04 Nov 2009, 13:05

[img]http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/8471/cammystruggle.gif[img]

I've never understood what Cammy is wearing. What, pantyhose with camo prints?

JD · « **Reply #2061 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 15:53 »

Quote from: Tom on 04 Nov 2009, 00:47

What the shit... Jade and the Dragon?

Yeah what the hell Jens

Jace · « **Reply #2062 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 17:21 »

Quote from: Alex C on 04 Nov 2009, 14:18

alignment system

I don't think Indy is all that lawful either, I mean he is stealing the artifacts. Sure he is stealing them from Nazis but he is still stealing them.

Alex C · « **Reply #2063 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 17:33 »

Yeah, there's probably a discussion to be had there as well, but I got distracted by Rorschach since he's more likely to set policemen on fire. Whatever he is, the man isn't good.

jhocking · « **Reply #2064 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 17:59 »

Quote from: Jace on 04 Nov 2009, 17:21

I don't think Indy is all that lawful either, I mean he is stealing the artifacts. Sure he is stealing them from Nazis but he is still stealing them.

Same here. My first thought when I saw the grid was that Indy should be Chaotic Good.

As for Rorschach, I would argue he is Lawful Neutral: neither good nor evil, he very rigidly sticks to a set of rules, it's just that his rules aren't the same as most of society's rules. So I wouldn't consider him an archetypal example of Lawful Neutral, I'm not sure who off the top of my head would be a good example.

Maybe an arms dealer. Or an amoral politician. There are plenty of politicians-without-empathy in war movies, any of them would be a good example of lawful neutral.

Alex C · « **Reply #2065 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 18:36 »

That's how I tend to interpret Lawful Neutral when left to my own devices, but as I remember the descriptions of each alignment varied a bit by edition. I remember that at one point Lawful Neutral was very strictly about tradition, honor, social standing and caste; it didn't allow for much room in regards to personal interpretations of justice or morality. For example, a samurai or knight who allows himself to be misused by his lord despite his own moral misgivings was the ultimate example of the Lawful Neutral mindset at one point. It was very feudal; you do what your boss tells you to do. Why? Because he told you to, ipso fuckin' facto. The best examples are probably guys from old Chinese parables about court politics and social order.

JD · « **Reply #2066 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 18:37 »

SirJuggles · « **Reply #2067 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 20:30 »

Oh my goodness slamball. When I was in elementary school that was the sport I had been dreaming of my whole life and never realized. Oh how I miss the 90's.

Blue Kitty · « **Reply #2068 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 20:55 »

Cartoon Network aired it for a little while every Saturday at noon.

JD · « **Reply #2069 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 23:02 »

McTaggart · « **Reply #2070 on:** 04 Nov 2009, 23:25 »

Quote from: Blue Kitty on 04 Nov 2009, 20:55

tf2/gorillaz

Sometimes the internet is wonderful.

E. Spaceman · « **Reply #2071 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 00:36 »

Mr. Doctor · « **Reply #2072 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 08:29 »

Quote from: Caleb on 04 Nov 2009, 12:29

Neutral Evil

I didn't get this one

, it was a great image though.

Caleb · « **Reply #2073 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 09:12 »

It's from a little role playing game that came out in 1974.

(or if you meant the dude it was from a little movie called No Country For Old Men)

Oh wow. A great google image today!

KickThatBathProf · « **Reply #2074 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 09:36 »

The one from yesterday was pretty good too

Emaline · « **Reply #2075 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 11:09 »

This may be a repost, but holy fucking shit dude!!

LeeC · « **Reply #2076 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 11:15 »

thats one lucky dude!

one of 2 favorite songs to pregame with

Caleb · « **Reply #2077 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 11:49 »

Quote from: Emaline on 05 Nov 2009, 11:09

This may be a repost, but holy fucking shit dude!!

ackblom12 · « **Reply #2078 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 11:51 »

That's.... terifying.

LeeC · « **Reply #2079 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 11:54 »

Bang your mushrooms/caps/horns!

Yayniall · « **Reply #2080 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 13:49 »

Who wants to Ram it?

LeeC · « **Reply #2081 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 15:46 »

Why dont you make like a tree

JD · « **Reply #2082 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 15:58 »

Emaline · « **Reply #2083 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 16:02 »

Jimor · « **Reply #2084 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 16:17 »

Quote from: Emaline on 05 Nov 2009, 11:09

This may be a repost, but holy fucking shit dude!!

Ditto for this guy who only lost his shoe vs a train.

Thomas Edison · « **Reply #2085 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 16:41 »

Not so lucky.

jhocking · « **Reply #2086 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 18:10 »

Quote from: Emaline on 05 Nov 2009, 11:09

This may be a repost, but holy fucking shit dude!!

The dude's an idiot. He saw the bus coming before he was in its path, but chose to run across in front of it.

LeeC · « **Reply #2087 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 18:18 »

jhocking · « **Reply #2088 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 20:13 »

cool animation:
http://vimeo.com/7174318

LeeC · « **Reply #2089 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 20:30 »

Bastardous Bassist · « **Reply #2090 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 20:38 »

Man, I totally expected an xzibit "yo dawg" joke.

Blue Kitty · « **Reply #2091 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 21:43 »

Extended version of Squirrels in my Pants

JD · « **Reply #2092 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 22:04 »

Oh Fuck

Long, but the ending is worth it

Lunchbox · « **Reply #2093 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 22:32 »

Oh man, that was terrible but great
(Side note: I used to make Joel Edgerton coffee)

KvP · « **Reply #2094 on:** 05 Nov 2009, 22:45 »

Quote from: Alex C on 04 Nov 2009, 17:33

Yeah, there's probably a discussion to be had there as well, but I got distracted by Rorschach since he's more likely to set policemen on fire. Whatever he is, the man isn't good.

Yeah, Rorschach is definitely not good.

Also Anton Chighur is chaotic evil. A lot of Cormac McCarthy's antagonists are textbook chaotic evil.

Christophe · « **Reply #2095 on:** 06 Nov 2009, 00:08 »

EDIT for Capybara addition:

David_Dovey · « **Reply #2096 on:** 06 Nov 2009, 00:21 »

Just when you thought it was safe to go back on the Internet:

JUGGALO FURRIES

Jimmy the Squid · « **Reply #2097 on:** 06 Nov 2009, 00:38 »

AAAAAUUUUUUGGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!

David_Dovey · « **Reply #2098 on:** 06 Nov 2009, 01:02 »

Oh and for the sake of completism and because it made me giggle and then say "d'awwww"

Jimor · « **Reply #2099 on:** 06 Nov 2009, 01:18 »

Sugar Daddy Ken

THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Author Topic: Re: POINTLESS THREAD IIa: ESCAPE FROM RAPTOR MOUNTAIN (Read 261893 times)

ackblom12