Putting a "killed on" date on food packaging says nothing about how the animals are treated. I think it is a fantasy that people somehow don't know that animals are killed for food. Sure they prefer to distance themselves from it, in the same way that they prefer to distance themselves from violence against humans by hiring cops and soldiers to do the skull-cracking and life-taking for them. But that does not mean that they do not know; it is just gift wrapping on not actually caring. Wrapping yourself in a white sheet because you only buy free-range is essentially a displacement activity, ignoring the roughly 80% of humanity that lives on less than US$10 per day now, but quite understandably aspires to eating diets as rich in protein as yours. Take a look at this map, and imagine everyone in Africa, China, and India eating as much meat as you...
Forum regulars know that
I do not eat meat, and I do not believe there is a "right" way to raise and slaughter animals for the table. For obvious reasons, I'm not exactly a fan of hunting. I think there are more efficient and humane ways than hunting of controlling non-human animal populations in the grotesquely unbalanced ecosystems that we have created (
and then we blame the deer!!!). I have a modest proposal for ethical hunting: The hunters should be licensed to hunt
each other, and the mutual consent would remove the ethical problem. If they choose to eat their kills, so be it.
Bon appétit!