@kharbevnor- Jawbreaker is not bland. I don't know what makes you say that. Oh, and Joy Division is not better than Nirvana. Yeah, I know that's from an old thread, but I can't believe you think that. Nothing against you personally, of course. I'm not aiming to start a flame war.
Grunge is, at best, a novelty, much like the hair metal it replaced.
Only with less musicianship and cocaine and more heroin and plaid.
As to Jawbreaker: all I have to go by is a song from the forced listening thread, and what I could find on youtube. Their one video 'Fireman' is just about tolerable until the soul-less singing kicks in alongside the most mind-numbingly generic 90's pop-punk riff I've ever heard outside of Green Day. The live stuff is better, if only because they seem to possibly have a different singer, or at least their singer has smoked about ten kilos of hash before the show, judging by his more gravelly voice. Still, it's nothing that I haven't heard about a hundred times before. I think this band must be something like Deftones: one arbitrary band from a completely worthless form of music that everyone has decided to love.
As for Nirvana: Kurt Cobain would have agreed with me. Hell, Kurt Cobain would have agreed The Field Mice were better than Nirvana. There is nothing special about Nirvana. They wrote some pretty good grunge songs, some stuff thats just objectively not bad, then Kurt gave his shotgun a blowjob. Nada. Though, I can't trash Nirvanas legacy completely: if not for them, fifteen year old stoners world wide would ALL wear that one Led Zeppelin shirt, instead of half of them wearing that one Nirvana shirt instead.
Also, I'm going to seriously question the purpose in criticising me for listening to black metal (a genre I would be surprised if you knew jack shit about), if you equate it to gangster rap and then
say yourself that you listen to gangster rap.