THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: westrim on 15 Sep 2013, 14:43

Title: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 15 Sep 2013, 14:43
Here's the throll. Choose as many as you like.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 15 Sep 2013, 15:34
No artificial holes for me, thanks. But if I ever figure out a compression algorithm that will allow it in a resolution that won't render the artist insane and/or blind I might be up for getting my DNA sequence tattooed somewhere.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 15 Sep 2013, 16:22
I want to eventually have multiple ear piercings like Hanners. Also a bunch more.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DrBear on 15 Sep 2013, 16:40
No holes or tattoos, ever, for two reasons:

1. Life is too short for self-inflicted pain. I can't understand why anyone would pierce their ears for earrings (I have sensitive skin and don't wear jewelry of any kind, not even a wedding ring, and I've been married 13 years).  I also had a bad experience after a near-fatal auto accident many years ago; I had a traction pin in my left leg, and it broke, meaning it had to be redrilled through my leg under local anesthetic. I don't recommend that to anyone.

2. I have large scars on my legs from that accident  and I am very self-conscious about them. Won't even wear shorts on a 100-degree day. The last thing I would do is add something I think is even more disfiguring (and I think most tattoo designs range between tacky and downright ugly, and are never the true colors; being a former professional photographer and design person, I'm sensitive about that).

I admit, it's also partly a generational thing; the only people when I was young who had either were sailors or carnys.  I still get that vibe from anybody with visible tattoos or guys with piercings. As for women with piercings/tats ... I just wonder why they would spoil their natural beauty.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 15 Sep 2013, 17:18
1. Life is too short for self-inflicted pain.
I'd say it's too short to let a little pain get in the way of something you want. Neither is less valid.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 15 Sep 2013, 17:20
I just don't want a piercing or a tattoo. I don't have anything against them, but I just don't want one on myself. Simple as that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 15 Sep 2013, 17:33
No holes or tattoos, ever, for two reasons:

1. Life is too short for self-inflicted pain.

As a tattooed and pierced person who had/has issues with self-inflicted pain, I think you're concentrating on the wrong aspect of the modification.

Quote
As for women with piercings/tats ... I just wonder why they would spoil their natural beauty.

Also this is messed up but I don't want to derail this thread further.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 15 Sep 2013, 17:49
Quote it in the tattoo thread.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mustang6172 on 15 Sep 2013, 18:21
No holes or tattoos, ever, for two reasons:

1. Life is too short for self-inflicted pain.

As a tattooed and pierced person who had/has issues with self-inflicted pain, I think you're concentrating on the wrong aspect of the modification.

Metal + flesh = pain

The same concept applies to bullets and swords.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 15 Sep 2013, 18:59
I am upset that there's no "Fuck piercings, MOAR TATTOOS" option. No I don't think there's any hypocrisy in that statement. Why do you ask? ;)

Also just for the record I wouldn't call getting a tattoo self inflicted pain. I napped through mine. Except the one on my collar bone. Freyja's red tears that hurt like a son of a bitch.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 15 Sep 2013, 20:43
BR's prediction:  Claire will hold Marten's hand for comfort during the procedure. 

And break his thumb in an overreaction to the pain - it'll be funny because it isn't us.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 15 Sep 2013, 20:44
Well, that went well. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 15 Sep 2013, 20:48
I wonder what else she'll get pierced!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 15 Sep 2013, 21:16
I **love** earrings. The larger the better. I'm very dowdy and introverted, but this is one area where I just let go. Peacock feathers, long dangly ones, giant hoops... I've never considered any other piercing though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 15 Sep 2013, 23:25
She could get antennas installed for Hannerdad's experiments in distributed sentience.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 15 Sep 2013, 23:27
I wonder what else she'll get pierced!

How far can we discuss this without violating the rules?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 15 Sep 2013, 23:36
To a first approximation, keep it above the waist.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 16 Sep 2013, 00:03
Interesting how the poll is shaking out. The NOPE option has a selection rate that belies its percentage, due to the multiple allowed votes and multiple piercing types.

My general opinion is that permanent (absent body healing and laser) body modification is shortsighted. As far as I'm concerned, you've got one body; don't mess with it. Just keep it clean, fit, and fueled.

To a first approximation, keep it above the waist.
There goes the dream of a Claire with pierced toe webbing...

Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 16 Sep 2013, 00:12
*groan*

To a second approximation, keep it either above the waist or below the knees.

As of right now, 21/31 people voted "nothing". Assuming they didn't check anything else, we can conclude that most people who want piercings in the first place also want multiple.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Just Karen on 16 Sep 2013, 00:12
Re: Piercings:  I get Claire's response; I had a similar reaction.  I didn't follow through because as a professional I wasn't really in a place (nor am I now) where alternative social expression is accepted; I was fortunate that my transition was as accepted as it was, and also fortunate that I came through it in a state that mostly blends in with the general population (I'm quasi-stealth; I don't hide it, I don't shout it from the rooftops).  I deal with clients, therefore I must at all times be able to be the face of the company.  Though I did consider having my nipples and bellybutton pierced.

Re: tattoos:  I...  well, frankly (and I know this sounds horrible and weird) I understand that others might want to, but I just don't understand people that make major cosmetic alterations to their body.  TKINMK, though, so whatever they like to do, more power to them. (TKINMK:  Their Kink Is Not My Kink).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 16 Sep 2013, 00:13
As far as I'm concerned, you've got one body; don't mess with it.
Aye: Piercings, tattoos, foreign chemicals, starvation ... just messing things up.

On the specific topic of piercings, man ... I'll never understand the appeal! (http://www.wastedtalent.ca/comic/tough-break)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 16 Sep 2013, 02:07
Body modifications just never seemed interesting to me for my own body. They're cool on other people, though. :)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: EspyPsyche on 16 Sep 2013, 02:07
No piercings please, but I would get a tattoo. My reason? Because I don't see myself pulling off piercings, but ink I think could look good.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 16 Sep 2013, 02:08
I had my ear pierced before by my dad. Nothing flash, just a ring. Honestly, I didn't give it much thought. But when I went into surgery (a story for another time...), and had to have it removed, I didn't bother putting it back in. To me, it was just a thing.

A tattoo... would be interesting. Nothing grandiose, a nice sleeve one would be nice. At the moment, I'm too broke, and I'd like it done professionally. Not something I'd leave for some backyard artist.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 16 Sep 2013, 02:19
BR's prediction:  Claire will hold Marten's hand for comfort during the procedure. 

And break his thumb in an overreaction to the pain - it'll be funny because it isn't us.

I got it half right - which of course also means I got it half wrong...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 16 Sep 2013, 02:23
BR's prediction:  Claire will hold Marten's hand for comfort during the procedure. 

And break his thumb in an overreaction to the pain - it'll be funny because it isn't us.

I got it half right - which of course also means I got it half wrong...
Well, what else was she going to hold?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 16 Sep 2013, 02:47
A teddy, duh. (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/CompletelyMissingThePoint)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 16 Sep 2013, 03:42
A teddy, duh. (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/CompletelyMissingThePoint)

I thought we weren't supposed to talk about sexual fantasies of characters here?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 16 Sep 2013, 04:16
The body's a temple and tattoos just mean you've installed stained glass.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 16 Sep 2013, 04:52
I feel so happy for Claire in this strip. Especially because the nervousness to the, "Let's do more!" is everyone if my modification experiences.

Metal + flesh = pain

The same concept applies to bullets and swords.

Bullets and swords don't put specifically chosen art on your body. Unless you're maybe into some abstract scarification.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 16 Sep 2013, 05:44
No, if the body is a Temple, tattoos, piercings and other body mods are like spray-painting graffiti on the walls and putting pink flamingoes on the lawn.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 16 Sep 2013, 06:53
No, if the body is a Temple, tattoos, piercings and other body mods are like spray-painting graffiti on the walls and putting pink flamingoes on the lawn.

Depending on your perspective - they may also be considered the equivalent of tasteful frescos and mosaics, with topiaries and statues.

To give some perspective to my earlier comment, when good friends of ours were having their first child, the husband offered his hand to his wife during one of the contractions during which she uttered a rather loud exclamation, as did he.  His lasted a bit longer and the nurse admonished him that he really didn't need to yell so much.  At which point everyone found out that his thumb had been broken, and that his subsequent screams were when his wife continued to squeeze ...

Protip - when offering your hand to someone to squeeze when they are in paid, protect your thumb....
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 16 Sep 2013, 09:40
Depending on your perspective - they may also be considered the equivalent of tasteful frescos and mosaics, with topiaries and statues.
Of course, there is art and there is art.

In before Pilchard (who probably still hasn't read Snuff anyway):

Quote
[They] reached a bridge that would not have been out of place back in the city.1

1Apart, that is, from the line of artistically naked ladies along its parapets. They were holding urns; urns is art.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FuryoftheStars on 16 Sep 2013, 10:35
Well said.  It's all in the "eye of the beholder".

I'd never get any piercings or tattoos, but that's because I don't think any of it would look good on me personally.  There are other people I've known where it looked pretty good, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 16 Sep 2013, 10:49
I have read Snuff, though only once so far.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 16 Sep 2013, 11:25
Well said.  It's all in the "eye of the beholder".
Or in this case, the eyebrow.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrudd on 16 Sep 2013, 12:34
The good lord, she designed this body with a set of specifications on what goes where and how. [or that is how the doctrine goes]
As with anything else there are manufacturing defects we have to deal with that are enough trouble as it is.
I ask why anyone would want to go with aftermarket modifications.

Seriously though, all joking aside, I ask why do so without diligent market research beforehand.

The liberal application of alcohol seems to be a deciding factor on sober regrets afterwards.
If you mod your house or your car or your PC without thinking things through you more times than not get a unpleasant surprise, but you can rebuild or replace those, your body, not so much.

[Hanners might have something in the works though]


Mind you I have seen a few examples of good body art but those are outnumbered by the number of barbed wire armlets, butterfly butts, Chinese Characters [they don't mean what you think they mean]  :psyduck: etc etc etc

Yes I did inadvertently give a tissue to someone who I thought had the sniffles  :? ..... it was a small enameled nose ring ..... It got changed to a gold stud soon after I hear.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 16 Sep 2013, 14:46
As has been said elsewhere, very few reputable tattoo artists or piercers will work on someone who is drunk. I'm all in favour of people choosing not to have body mods if they don't want to - but it is none of anyone else's business if someone wants to get a tattoo or piercing that someone else doesn't approve of. It's almost the only behaviour which doesn't in any way harm anyone else at all (the only possible exception to this is if someone gets extremely offensive slogans or symbols tattooed onto them).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 16 Sep 2013, 15:03
As has been said elsewhere, very few reputable tattoo artists or piercers will work on someone who is drunk. I'm all in favor of people choosing not to have body mods if they don't want to - but it is none of anyone else's business if someone wants to get a tattoo or piercing that someone else doesn't approve of. It's almost the only behavior which doesn't in any way harm anyone else at all (the only possible exception to this is if someone gets extremely offensive slogans or symbols tattooed onto them).
The large number of drunken tattoo stories out there doesn't really make that point comforting. No one I can recall here has said anything close to disapproving meddling. Most human behaviors affect no one else most of the time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Emperor Norton on 16 Sep 2013, 15:09
I would have thought that a forum that tries to be as accepting as this one wouldn't be so judgmental towards a person choosing to get tattoos and piercings.

I mean, I personally have neither, though I've considered tattoos, but I certainly don't look at anyone else and say "Man, why would they mess up their body with that." Their body, their choice.

Though I do usually have a thing about being wary of getting anything that can't be taken out or hidden by sleeves if you plan to go into a white collar field. So yeah, just be sure you never want to try to get an office job if you are going to do some of the crazier gauges or tattoos on the hands/neck/face.

Also big on putting real thought into any tattoos, you are stuck with them, so you want to make sure you choose well.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 16 Sep 2013, 15:14
Good gravy.  What hath been unleashed with Claire?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 16 Sep 2013, 15:27
be sure you never want to try to get an office job if you are going to do some of the crazier gauges or tattoos on the hands/neck/face.
I don't have any tattoos and at the moment I don't have any piercings (I did in college and may again as soon as Friday), but other than smallish stretched ears (which can be disguised) I don't plan on getting any other piercings or any tattoos that can't be covered by clothing for that exact reason. I wouldn't tell anyone else not to, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mtmerrick on 16 Sep 2013, 15:53
piercings aren't my thing, but i'm not against them. however, i do plan on eventually  getting sub-dermal implants (things like neodymium implants, not like horns or something)

i am not against piercings, but i only find certain ones done in certain ways attractive (and never too many!)

i would love to have a tattoo, but i'm so goddamn indecisive i have no idea what i would get and would probably regret something i did get shortly after i got it.

i find many tattoos gaudy as hell, but well done ones are quite attractive.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 16 Sep 2013, 16:08
I would have thought that a forum that tries to be as accepting as this one wouldn't be so judgmental towards a person choosing to get tattoos and piercings.
Me too, actually, especially since our host has both. I come from a cultural background that is quite hostile to body mods generally (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,28415.msg1120275/topicseen.html#msg1120275), but I think it's best not to condemn other people's choices in this. In the interests of full disclosure, I suppose I should say that I have "vanilla" pierced ears (I don't know the correct term for one small hole in each ear-lobe), but I don't remember any particular emotional reaction to the piercing, other than satisfaction that I could wear a wider range of earrings.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 16 Sep 2013, 16:12
I would have thought that a forum that tries to be as accepting as this one wouldn't be so judgmental towards a person choosing to get tattoos and piercings.

I was thinking this as well but couldn't think of a good way to say it. Particularly statements saying modifications "ruin" your body or to that effect? That's obviously not the perspective of people who get them or admire them from a distance.

I think this is a great Facebook page for showing and promoting tattoo acceptance in workplaces. https://www.facebook.com/TattooedAndEmployed
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ackblom12 on 16 Sep 2013, 16:16
be sure you never want to try to get an office job if you are going to do some of the crazier gauges or tattoos on the hands/neck/face.

I don't have enough vitriol to respond to this at the moment, but seriously, this line (which is regularly an excuse to be an asshole, intentional or not) needs to fall in the ditch of dead and forgotten things.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 16 Sep 2013, 16:32
I think that (the message in the forum, not the view of body mods) is a pragmatic reminder of the prejudice, rather than a suggestion that it's appropriate. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Emperor Norton on 16 Sep 2013, 16:39
I don't have enough vitriol to respond to this at the moment, but seriously, this line (which is regularly an excuse to be an asshole, intentional or not) needs to fall in the ditch of dead and forgotten things.

Its a statement of reality. I don't have to like that tattoos and piercings are seen as a negative in business to admit its true.

I mean, hell, I hate the whole facial hair stuff that most jobs do, but I can be honest that they DO it. Facial hair though is temporary, and I can head to the bathroom at any time and shave off my beard (even though I look better with it than without it).

While I will never judge someone for their choice of tattoo/piercings/hairstyle/love of having a crazy beard, I'm well aware that society as a whole DOES, and taking precautions from keeping it from affecting me, and telling other people to be wary of the reactions that can prevent them from making a living in a field they would prefer is in no way something to be angry about.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ackblom12 on 16 Sep 2013, 16:43
The sentiment was more aimed at that rather common line than you, to be honest. The issue is that it regularly comes in after someone is taking about how totally OK they are that other people like this thing that's really gross and ruins how someone looks, or how drunk decisions lead to sober results. Being true does not make it any less condescending in many cases.

Basically, do you really think anyone who gets visible mods is not aware of the very real societal side effects?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Emperor Norton on 16 Sep 2013, 16:54
Basically, do you really think anyone who gets visible mods is not aware of the very real societal side effects?

I live in a college town and end up seeing a lot of people in their late teens, very early 20s, and I sincerely doubt 90% of them know where they are going to be in 10 years. I don't like seeing them close doors for themselves before they even figure out their place in life. So do I think people are aware of the societal side effects? Yes, I do. Do I think people are always aware of where they want their life to go, especially when they are just becoming an adult? No, not really. Do I think people in early college have an understanding of living in the "real world"? Some do, not all of them.

Don't take it personally. Its not directed at any single person. Its a generic piece of advice. One that I've known several people who could have had it stressed to them when they were younger. Hell, my brother has a scar on his face from having a tattoo removed that he had gotten in his early 20s when he was pretty much a bum with a guitar and no direction. Now, he has two different degrees in chemistry and works in a lab doing research and if I asked him when he got the tattoo if he saw himself going into this now, he probably wouldn't have known. (He still has a really nice chest piece though).

Is it condescending? No more than any other advice.

(Hell, I'm married, have two kids, one nearly a teenager, and I still can't tell you where I think I'm going to be in 10 years.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ackblom12 on 16 Sep 2013, 17:11
It's pretty rare that anything but a facial tattoo isn't easily removed, hidden or 'repaired', keep in mind. I'm well aware of the stigma that is associated with various body art, and I'm well aware of the problems that can come along with it. I'd be considered well beyond the point of no return in several ways by most, but outside of the genuine sense of loss if I had to change the way I choose to be, I could still get myself office ready if I absolutely had to.

But once again, the issue of condescendence has nothing to do with intent. It has to do with someone who isn't well familiar with it giving the advice as if it's something they had never thought of, despite probably having heard it hundreds of times. Given by those who have work done, it's generally considered a word of caution. Most of us have had that talk from someone within the community at some point, usually by an artist. However, when it's saddled up with a story of how someone else got rid of their visible work and then became a successful person, not so much.

I mean it sincerely when I say that while I am well aware the intent coming from you is not meant to be condescending, intent doesn't make as much difference as you might like.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 16 Sep 2013, 17:19
That may be changing anyway. The teller I went to at the bank today had a nose ring.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 16 Sep 2013, 17:23
. So yeah, just be sure you never want to try to get an office job if you are going to do some of the crazier gauges or tattoos on the hands/neck/face.


False, I have plenty of ink, I hold an office job with a highly respectable international business. Our president commented on my shoulder piece last time he was in country. He thought it looked cool and wanted to know what the text meant.

As has been said elsewhere, very few reputable tattoo artists or piercers will work on someone who is drunk. I'm all in favor of people choosing not to have body mods if they don't want to - but it is none of anyone else's business if someone wants to get a tattoo or piercing that someone else doesn't approve of. It's almost the only behavior which doesn't in any way harm anyone else at all (the only possible exception to this is if someone gets extremely offensive slogans or symbols tattooed onto them).
The large number of drunken tattoo stories out there doesn't really make that point comforting. No one I can recall here has said anything close to disapproving meddling. Most human behaviors affect no one else most of the time.

It's down right illegal in most states. I can tell you in the modern day and age this is almost 100% full of shit. You have to legally consent to the tattoo (probably piercing as well) in the majority of states and formally acknowledge aftercare. Just like sex you cannot legally consent to anything while intoxicated. Parlors can get closed DOWN for that shit. Interestingly most of the people I know with drunken tattoo stories don't have any ink and except for one old Vietnam Vet who was hammered in Saigon on a pass one night, I haven't met any one outside of a couple specific social groups that tend to do their own ink (Biker gangs) that have drunk tattoos.

The stereotype of ink as a drunken mistake is some of the most prejudiced, unfounded horseshit I have ever heard and I have heard a lot of BS over the years.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Zebediah on 16 Sep 2013, 17:23
Honestly, there are so many, many people getting tattoos and piercings these days that the prejudice against it is going to be unsustainable before long. Especially in certain fields, like software development - you want creative people, you have to take into account that they have to express their individuality. In my case, it's long hair, which doesn't even raise an eyebrow in the software field any more. But back in the 90s, it was very much a case of "You want my programming skills? The hair is part of the package. Ask me to cut my hair, I walk." To a certain extent, it worked to my advantage - people assumed that  if I could get away with keeping my hair long, I had to be pretty damned good.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Emperor Norton on 16 Sep 2013, 17:35
I mean it sincerely when I say that while I am well aware the intent coming from you is not meant to be condescending, intent doesn't make as much difference as you might like.

And out of all the people in the thread, you thought the person who needs to be called out is the person who said "Do whatever you want with your body, just make sure you are aware of the ramifications"?

Seriously? In a thread where people are saying things like "ruining their natural beauty" you want to pull out the fact that I said something that was a straight up truth about how the way the world works and make a big deal about it, and express how you have too much vitriol to it to even respond fully?

Apparently, if I was covered with tatts, this same advice would be fine, but because I personally haven't chosen to get any at this point in my life, I'm not allowed to mention it? Oh no, its been said a hundred times! Who cares. Its not untrue, and just because I'm not in the "scene" doesn't make me any less capable of realizing it. (hint: I've known enough people who faced this problem to understand, I'm not THAT old).

ALSO: That was in a part of the post where I was talking about my OWN decisions on tattoos for me personally. I mentioned it as a reason I wouldn't personally get a tattoo in certain areas, and then as an aside added that people should keep it in mind.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Emperor Norton on 16 Sep 2013, 17:39
. So yeah, just be sure you never want to try to get an office job if you are going to do some of the crazier gauges or tattoos on the hands/neck/face.


False, I have plenty of ink, I hold an office job with a highly respectable international business. Our president commented on my shoulder piece last time he was in country. He thought it looked cool and wanted to know what the text meant.

1. There are always exceptions. While its getting laxer, it does have a strong possibility of affecting your chances of employment.
2. Shoulder piece doesn't sound like its on your neck/hands/face. (possibly on your neck I suppose if its rather large.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 16 Sep 2013, 17:53
I think part of the reason you've been called out even though there have been some vile opinions, is you're the only one who actually told people what they should not do with their own body. It was closely phrased that way, at least.
While no one has directly said this is the case, rather than the point being, "Don't get tattoos because you'll be judged on then and possibly discriminated against in the workplace." should it not be, "Don't judge people on their appearance."? Not getting modifications will not make people more tolerant of them.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Emperor Norton on 16 Sep 2013, 18:06
I think part of the reason you've been called out even though there have been some vile opinions, is you're the only one who actually told people what they should not do with their own body. It was closely phrased that way, at least.
While no one has directly said this is the case, rather than the point being, "Don't get tattoos because you'll be judged on then and possibly discriminated against in the workplace." should it not be, "Don't judge people on their appearance."? Not getting modifications will not make people more tolerant of them.

Whether you or I judge anyone based on their appearance won't change the policies of a corporation, it won't change the people interviewing you. Maybe if enough people did it throughout the world to the point that they had no choice, it could change, but I'm not putting myself on the front line of that, and people should really think about whether they want to be. Maybe I worded it badly, but what I was saying was "This is why I won't get a tattoo in certain areas, and its a good idea to be aware of this issue."

I know what its like to be unemployed and have a family. Its hard enough and scary enough as it is.

Its not hippie land. If I get a tattoo on my face and believe in not judging people based on their appearance, that doesn't stop anyone else from judging me for it.

If people really find "beware of prejudice, it exists", to be more offensive than people espousing how people are ruining their bodies I'm not even sure how to react to that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ackblom12 on 16 Sep 2013, 18:26
Everyone else had already been called out. Also I wasn't really calling you out specifically, just the line of reasoning. I apologize if that came out as a direct attack.

Me telling you it's condescending is not me saying it's more offensive than anyone saying that it's incredibly stupid to do such a thing to your body. I called it out because whether you like it or not, it's a bit of 'advice' that has issues depending on the source and the person's understanding of the community. The fact that you weren't hateful does not cause all problems with it to go away.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mustang6172 on 16 Sep 2013, 18:46
I'm thinking this story arc would have been more interesting if Hanners had gone with Claire instead of Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 16 Sep 2013, 18:57
Now there's a thought considering the dichotomy that that would present. 

Especially with Hanners having piercings of her own and her OCD issues.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 16 Sep 2013, 19:36
Hannelore's been a terrific friend for Marigold and could sympathize with Claire's anxieties.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Schmee on 16 Sep 2013, 20:27
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Skewbrow on 16 Sep 2013, 21:58
This is the Faye we know and love.

Claire will learn in due time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 16 Sep 2013, 22:08
The Snarkasarus strikes.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: CrowFairy on 16 Sep 2013, 22:25
Did anyone else think the comic looks a little ... fuzzy? The text looks fine. But the drawings look a little blurry.

Edit: As of 3:13 PM CST on 9-17-13, the comic looks fine.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Arancaytar on 16 Sep 2013, 22:33
Re: hand-holding in yesterday's strip. Dammit, when will Jeph stop teasing! :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 17 Sep 2013, 00:10
Never.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 17 Sep 2013, 00:55
Never.

I certainly hope he never does. It's half of my enjoyment of this strip.

Today's strip: I am stealing Marten's last line, that was great.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 17 Sep 2013, 02:08
Classic Faye. Classic Marten too.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 17 Sep 2013, 03:43
Re: piercings & shit (late again...) 

I have a small gold hoop that I got in my left ear in 1988.  I think I've removed it briefly... three times?  For job interviews.  It went back in after I got the job. Oh, yeah, and an MRI last year.  Don't want anything torn out... damn, that's 25 years now. 


Doesn't change the fact that, after losing my main job last year at the age of 50, my father's only job seeking advice was to look at me and tell me to "lose the god-damned earring".   :roll:  (yeah, he was 79 at the time...)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: 94ssd on 17 Sep 2013, 04:00
As for preventing employment, I work with the theatre department at my school and some actor's tattoos are a problem. Small ones can be covered up, but at a certain point we can't afford to spend hundreds of dollars and an extra hour before a show covering up "Ensemble Member #12's" full sleeve, and the concealer will start to separate under the lights anyway.

If there's one career where you need to consider the ramifications of modifying your body it's acting. Small facial piercings, fine for theatre. Small tattoos or ones that normally not visible, usually fine. Anything else and you start to slowly but surely limit the range of roles you can be cast in, and the LAST thing a working actor can afford to do is limit their castability.

That said, I still plan on getting some tattoos at some point. The place I work at now allows any tattoos no problem, facial piercings just have to be taken out at work.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: LTK on 17 Sep 2013, 06:05
Today's was comedy gold. Wondermark did a really funny one as well. I wish there were more Tuesday comics!

Re: piercings & shit (late again...) 

I have a small gold hoop that I got in my left ear in 1988.  I think I've removed it briefly... three times?  For job interviews.  It went back in after I got the job. Oh, yeah, and an MRI last year.  Don't want anything torn out... damn, that's 25 years now. 


Doesn't change the fact that, after losing my main job last year at the age of 50, my father's only job seeking advice was to look at me and tell me to "lose the god-damned earring".   :roll:  (yeah, he was 79 at the time...)
But gold is not ferromagnetic.  :?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 17 Sep 2013, 06:09
I guess that it could still produce artefacts through shadowing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 17 Sep 2013, 07:35
I have my ears pierced, but that's all.
I've considered a small, tasteful tattoo in a discrete place - no more than 1" square - but decided against.

That's my choice.

I'll be darned though if I impose my own standards on anyone else!

I'd advise my son of the likely consequences of body piercings and permanent in-your-face body art on employment prospects - as well as safety issues if he goes into search and rescue, as he wants to do at the moment. But it's his choice. There's no "moral" issue here, just one of individual taste. I've never seen the appeal - but how many see the appeal in an activity I enjoy, painting and decaling 1/144 WWI aircraft models? Darn fewer than who have ink!   
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 17 Sep 2013, 07:52
Any conductor can have eddy currents. Consider magnetic braking and then what happens if the magnetic field is moving.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: rschill on 17 Sep 2013, 12:49
I don't have any tattoos or piercings.  I think they're almost always cool and/or sexy as hell on others though, but I just can't go through with it myself.  I can't think of a way I could do it and still feel genuine about it.  Maybe it's my age.  And it's too late to start now as I get an eczema flare up at the least irritation. 

The closest thing I've come to being prejudiced was one time a few months ago when I started to get offended when I saw a cop with full on sleeve tattoos.  I  started to say "Back when I was your age, just having those damn near made probable cause, kid" then I thought better of it. 

What a strange way for my father's red neck to catch up to me. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 17 Sep 2013, 12:56
I don't think you meant "too late" as in being too old but age-wise, it's never too late.

Grandma shows off first tattoo at 86
(http://i1.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article2269905.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/Tattoo1-2269905.jpg) (http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/grandma-shows-first-tattoo-age-2269764)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 17 Sep 2013, 14:54
Tweet from Jeph:

 J P H J C Q S        ✔ @jephjacques
fell down 3 times. there probably will not be a comic tonight. I'm sorry.
-------

Sorry about that, Jeph.  Get well soon!  And don't worry about the comic, we will survive.

Iechyd da!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 17 Sep 2013, 14:55
Any conductor can have eddy currents.
Excellent post timing. It is Léon Foucault (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9on_Foucault)'s birthday today.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 17 Sep 2013, 14:58
But gold is not ferromagnetic.  :?

It's only 10 karat, so 10/24 gold.  The rest could be nearly anything, but may well be magnetic. 

Besides, protocol at the hospital is to remove all jewelry, just in case. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 17 Sep 2013, 15:04
Yeah I wouldn't take that chance, no matter how much I trust science (I am not sure I trust jewellers!).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mlle Germain on 17 Sep 2013, 15:29
I think if I ever decided on getting ear piercings (I would not want any others, I think), I would be nervous just like Claire. And presumably like Hanners in the sence that I'd be worried constantly about them getting infected - I get infections very easily. Ah well, maybe some day I'll try it. Then I'll just have to be as fastidious about them as Hanners was.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 17 Sep 2013, 15:31
Why is Hanners blonde? 

It was from dunking her head into a bucket of hydrogen peroxide to clean all 10 piercings at once...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 17 Sep 2013, 15:42
Eh... A QC joke in the question/punchline format? I like it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 17 Sep 2013, 18:33
Why is Hanners blonde? 

It was from dunking her head into a bucket of hydrogen peroxide to clean all 10 piercings at once...

Carl-E wins thread.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: 94ssd on 17 Sep 2013, 19:45
No comic tonight due to Jeph's back woes. I've had that experience and I wouldn't wish it on anyone. Hope he feels better soon.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 17 Sep 2013, 20:48
A back spasm was the first time I experienced something I'd read about, which was sweating in pain.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: KOK on 18 Sep 2013, 01:42
I would have thought that it was the trainer's job to prevent such injuries.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 18 Sep 2013, 04:56
I don't have any tattoos or piercings.  I think they're almost always cool and/or sexy as hell on others though, but I just can't go through with it myself.  I can't think of a way I could do it and still feel genuine about it.  Maybe it's my age.  And it's too late to start now as I get an eczema flare up at the least irritation. 

The closest thing I've come to being prejudiced was one time a few months ago when I started to get offended when I saw a cop with full on sleeve tattoos.  I  started to say "Back when I was your age, just having those damn near made probable cause, kid" then I thought better of it. 

What a strange way for my father's red neck to catch up to me.

It happens. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 18 Sep 2013, 05:05
No comic tonight due to Jeph's back woes. I've had that experience and I wouldn't wish it on anyone. Hope he feels better soon.
Seen it in my dad. Not cool even at second-hand experience. All the best and take it easy, Jeph!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 18 Sep 2013, 05:52
Feel better, Jeph.  :-)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: CrowFairy on 18 Sep 2013, 08:04
Best wishes, Jeph. Some steroid shots should help with the pain.

This is especially close to home because my mom has ruptured discs in her back three times now, one of which was a couple of weeks ago. v.v
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 18 Sep 2013, 08:10
Yep, just in case you forget your hate for the forums for a second and look into this thread:
Get well soon!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 18 Sep 2013, 16:38
Take care Jeph and get well soon.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Squiddlywinx on 18 Sep 2013, 19:28
Best wishes to Jeph.

But Amir doesn't get his own friend.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 18 Sep 2013, 23:48
It's WMG time!

Today's comic is a sheet of characters. As far as I can make out, none of the characters that have explicitly been written out permanently (or only had bit-parts) are there, which suggests that those that are will be returning at some point. Gabby (3 right, 3 down) and Raven (2, 3) are both on there. Hmm...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: weisbm on 19 Sep 2013, 04:25
Jeph,

Feel better soon!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Sep 2013, 05:18
As for written out semi-permanently (because nobody's died, I don't think), add Padma to that list.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Schmee on 19 Sep 2013, 05:45
add Padma to that list.

...but then again, Amir is missing his beard, and looks slightly androgynous...

[/wishfulthinking]
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 19 Sep 2013, 05:58
Faye, Marten, Dora, Hannelore
Marigold, Dale, Emily, Claire
Sven, Raven, Gabby, Tai
Wil, Penelope, Cosette, Steve
Momo, Angus, Amir
Pintsize, Winslow
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Sep 2013, 06:25
I wonder how many new avatars will come from this.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 19 Sep 2013, 06:43
Love your new custom title, dude.

(though it brings back memories from a different forum, where the biggest contributor and biggest troll went through a ”Big Lebowski” phase. I think that was right after his ”Kim Jong Un” phase)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 19 Sep 2013, 06:44
I wonder how many new avatars will come from this.
At least two, thus far...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Sep 2013, 06:50
Thanks, ankh! Nicely done, techkid.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 19 Sep 2013, 07:02
I've always liked Wil.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 19 Sep 2013, 07:42
I want to draw Sheamus, the lad in my avatar, in the style of the QC heads now. Then I can sort of keep my avatar while being part of the avatar trend.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Wetman on 19 Sep 2013, 07:51
What's it like to have friends?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Sep 2013, 08:11
Like a disease (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1145).

Welcome!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 19 Sep 2013, 08:46
Love your new custom title, dude.

I wondered how long it would take the other mods to notice that I'd given them access to that after I set one up for myself; answer: longer than I expected!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Sep 2013, 09:00
Haha, I wouldn't have noticed if I hadn't gone to change my avatar.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 19 Sep 2013, 09:42
I'd rather have an easy way of changing avatars with each access, as Paul has done. I have several other QC backsides to put in rotation.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 19 Sep 2013, 09:59
I provide that from my own server; there's no way it'll happen in the forum software!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrudd on 19 Sep 2013, 11:02
Heads will roll  .....
So when will we get something drawn with a muskrat in it?

@Red   Rotating backsides?   :psyduck:

Paul - how you do that?
Just point to where its explained elsewhere - don't want to blargle up the thread more than normal.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 19 Sep 2013, 11:34
He's got a PHP script on his site that selects a random image to return when someone accesses http://cassland.org/images/QCavi.jpg . I don't think the ability to link the avatar directly to an external URL is allowed for normal forum users, though.

edit -- it is allowed, apparently. Hold on, I gotta idea.  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 19 Sep 2013, 12:31
Paul - how you do that?
Just point to where its explained elsewhere - don't want to blargle up the thread more than normal.

My avatar is a call to a routine on my server* that delivers a random image from a list of over 20 250 - so each time you refresh it, it changes, and each person may be seeing a different one at the same time; it is meant to confuse or intrigue, depending on your nature.

* For the technically minded, this is done by the following lines in my Apache config:
RewriteMap AviFile rnd:C:/WebPages/cassland.org/html/images/Avatars/AviList.txt
RewriteRule /images/QCavi.jpg /images/Avatars/${AviFile:QClist}.jpg


Actually one line of that is slightly longer now to do a 2-stage look-up, getting round a bug that makes it sometimes return a null result if a line in the avilist.txt file is longer than 1024 characters.  The avis (and some that aren't currently used) can be seen here (http://cassland.org/images/avatars).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 19 Sep 2013, 12:47
Okay, that's simpler than what I had in mind for it... but I just got a version working using PHP (hopefully it doesn't use too much bandwidth on my site...)  :-D

edit -- if anyone wants all the faces from the current comic, you can find them here (http://cesiumcomics.com/Stuff/QCfaces).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 19 Sep 2013, 13:36
So I need a backside server.

If I had the slightest idea what I was doing (or step-by-step directions), I'd dedicate a little Linksys NSLU2 NAS or a Raspberry Pi  to the task.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 19 Sep 2013, 15:59
I'm happy with Miss Powers.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 19 Sep 2013, 16:17
And does Miss Powers serve backsides?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 19 Sep 2013, 16:26
Got a list of those backside images? I could probably set up a script on my site to do that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 19 Sep 2013, 16:34
I need a day or two to edit.

It was surprising to Google backside server and be learn that it is a thing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 19 Sep 2013, 16:36
I couldn't get the idea of remaking my avatar as today's comic style.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Wetman on 19 Sep 2013, 16:52
Like a disease (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1145).

Welcome!
Probably the hardest disease ever to catch.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 19 Sep 2013, 17:12
(http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f50/Kugai2/310596_1766448579776_1238781_n.jpg?t=1379635857)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: maxh on 19 Sep 2013, 17:21
nobody's died, I don't think
Sara was eaten by an allosaur (I suppose it's theoretically possible she somehow survived), wheelchair guy (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1350) probably got blown up (though Tortura survived, so he might have as well), and Randy was killed by Yelling Bird at least 132 512 times (but Randy is eternal, so that doesn't really count).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Sep 2013, 17:31
Sara was eaten by an allosaur
This isn't canon (canon meaning actually in or at least mentioned in the strip).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 19 Sep 2013, 17:34
Got a list of those backside images? I could probably set up a script on my site to do that.

turn off safesearch and you'll see plenty of backside images
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 19 Sep 2013, 17:35
... among other things.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: maxh on 19 Sep 2013, 17:52
Sara was eaten by an allosaur
This isn't canon (canon meaning actually in or at least mentioned in the strip).
I'd say the cast list (http://www.questionablecontent.net/cast.php) qualifies as canon as well. (And, upon further review, it confirms that she did not survive.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Sep 2013, 18:25
I would not say that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 19 Sep 2013, 18:46
Yeah, for it to be truly canon it has to have been in the comic and not as a guest strip.

On his tumblr (http://jephjacques.com) Jeph answered one of my questions (http://jephjacques.com/post/10973725252/qa-dump-06) about whether the cast twitter accounts (https://twitter.com/jephjacques/lists/qccast) were canon and he replied that they were, but only to the extent that they don't conflict with the comic itself.

Basically, if tomorrow he decides to make a comic with Sara in it, eating cereal or something (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2407), the comic takes precedence and complaining that he's retconning her is bad form.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 19 Sep 2013, 18:51
Comic's up.

Boy, Claire's a bit... self-centered?... over this ear piercing thing, isn't she?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 19 Sep 2013, 19:24
Faye haters in 3... 2... 1...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Sep 2013, 19:32
Why? She handled it well.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 19 Sep 2013, 19:35
Got a list of those backside images? I could probably set up a script on my site to do that.

turn off safesearch and you'll see plenty of backside images
But they wouldn't be canon.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 19 Sep 2013, 20:37
Quote
Next week I go into the studio to begin recording the Deathmøle album! I am tremendously excited. See you Monday!

So....we can't say "Break a Leg?"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 19 Sep 2013, 21:25
Got a list of those backside images? I could probably set up a script on my site to do that.

turn off safesearch and you'll see plenty of backside images
But they wouldn't be canon.
I've been wondering... whose backside is your current avatar, and which comic is it from?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Toe on 19 Sep 2013, 22:46
And why is Claire behind the counter?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 20 Sep 2013, 00:03
I've been wondering... whose backside is your current avatar, and which comic is it from?

I'm pretty sure that's Hannelore.


...now I wonder why the hell I think this.

Gotta love Claire's face expression in the first three panels and Marten's in the last.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 20 Sep 2013, 00:10
Like a disease (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1145).

Welcome!
Probably the hardest disease ever to catch.
I know I am not setting a good example by doubleposting, but my mobile sucks for editing text.  You don't have to tell us now, but the Relate forum always has an open ear.
Also, I'd argue the hardest to catch is probably the Black Plague or something.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 20 Sep 2013, 00:53
I like being wrong sometimes.

Why? She handled it well.

I thought so too. (:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 20 Sep 2013, 03:29
Yeah, for it to be truly canon it has to have been in the comic and not as a guest strip.

On his tumblr (http://jephjacques.com) Jeph answered one of my questions (http://jephjacques.com/post/10973725252/qa-dump-06) about whether the cast twitter accounts (https://twitter.com/jephjacques/lists/qccast) were canon and he replied that they were, but only to the extent that they don't conflict with the comic itself.

Basically, if tomorrow he decides to make a comic with Sara in it, eating cereal or something (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2407), the comic takes precedence and complaining that he's retconning her is bad form.

Jeph's been very good not to have had to do any retconning - of course I may have different expectations from all those years of reading Marvel comics.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 20 Sep 2013, 03:48
And DC. How many times has superman come back from the dead only to be back patrolling and beating up intergang the next week?
Never mind the crisis/es.
Basically, mainstream paper comics are creative black holes, sucking up talent only to spew out the same old stuff over and over.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 20 Sep 2013, 04:06
IIRC, the crises were an attempt to fix the canon.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 20 Sep 2013, 04:06
Claire wants Martin's attention back XD
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Sep 2013, 04:43
IIRC, the crises were an attempt to fix the canon.
What's the difference between "fix" and "change"?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 20 Sep 2013, 04:50
They knew it was a mess, so they just pulled "it was a parallel universe all along" out.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crisis_on_Infinite_Earths#Continuity_issues
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 20 Sep 2013, 05:01
Boy, Claire's a bit... self-centered?... over this ear piercing thing, isn't she?

She's vulnerable, that's all.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 20 Sep 2013, 05:28
It was a pretty big thing for Claire, so you have to give her points for that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 20 Sep 2013, 06:27
Got a list of those backside images? I could probably set up a script on my site to do that.

turn off safesearch and you'll see plenty of backside images
But they wouldn't be canon.
I've been wondering... whose backside is your current avatar, and which comic is it from?

Oh, Faye's, but I don't immediately have the comic. I'm not keeping a count, but Jeph seemed to draw her bottom more than those of the rest of the women.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 20 Sep 2013, 06:36
Well, it is a luscious and/or lush's bottom.  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 20 Sep 2013, 07:22
I'm sticking with mine.  There are not enough GOM images in the comic to warrant a server script...

And I knew that was Faye. 


How did I know that was Faye? 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 20 Sep 2013, 09:33
Like a disease (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1145).

Welcome!
Probably the hardest disease ever to catch.

Not really - you just have to expose yourself to it! Go lots of places where it might be lurking and open yourself up to infection. It's one of those rare diseases where if you pretend to have it, you really are more likely to get it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 20 Sep 2013, 10:08
I'm sticking with mine.  There are not enough GOM images in the comic to warrant a server script...

And I knew that was Faye. 


How did I know that was Faye?

Because like many guys, you have excellent FBR. I think you've remarked on it yourself.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 Sep 2013, 11:31
It was a pretty big thing for Claire, so you have to give her points for that.

Overcoming a fear is after all one of the most difficult things there is, no matter what it's a fear of.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 20 Sep 2013, 11:40
Claire should learn the Litany Against Fear.


But who is Bene Gesserit enough to teach her?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 Sep 2013, 11:56
Veronica Vance has mastered The Voice.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 20 Sep 2013, 12:05
True.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: briscoe on 20 Sep 2013, 13:47
really feelin this new arc but it seems like Faye's level of pride/sense of achievement is not really commensurate with having been named the mid-late-20s assistant manager of her best friend's coffee shop, where she's been working for ~5 years
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 20 Sep 2013, 14:01
We don't know how long Faye's been there, but the comic-time we've seen isn't more than three years and she told Marten she was "new" in town very early on. Speaking of, pretty sure Marten is Faye's bestie right now, not Dora, though she'd be pretty up there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 20 Sep 2013, 14:12
It's just one more thing in Faye's life that is finally showing healthy progress and growth. She has complained in the past of being a dead-end job, and ok there's not a lot of career progression options from here, but it's still a pay raise with additional responsibility. She has a functional, happy relationship with a boyfriend she loves, she is getting counselling for her emotional issues and on the whole her friendship group seems stable. I expect she's feeling pleased about all those things together.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Smallest on 20 Sep 2013, 14:26
Re: poll, I don't really want piercings, but on the other hand I want to get into piercing just as piercing, so I selected both nothing and several things.

Re:comic, do I sense some jealousy?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ackblom12 on 20 Sep 2013, 14:42
Smallest, if you're interested in the subject we have a general body modification thread in Chatter that you might be up your alley. The first page has a collection of links for books, documentaries and other resources. I'd link it, but I'm writing this from a phone.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 Sep 2013, 15:11
really feelin this new arc but it seems like Faye's level of pride/sense of achievement is not really commensurate with having been named the mid-late-20s assistant manager of her best friend's coffee shop, where she's been working for ~5 years

Welcome, new person!

I see your point.

There's also such a thing as pride in overcoming a post-traumatic freeze up. As part of the pattern of restarting sculpting, making friends, and generally uncurling from her fetal hedgehog position, she's got grounds for pride.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 20 Sep 2013, 15:45
fetal hedgehog position

That registers very high on the pithy/insightful scale.  In three words, you summed up Faye's personality for the first 1600 strips or so. 

My hat's off to you. 

(http://myco-tek.org/images/smilies/hats_off.gif)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 20 Sep 2013, 16:12
I'm sticking with mine.  There are not enough GOM images in the comic to warrant a server script...

And I knew that was Faye. 


How did I know that was Faye?

Because like many guys, you have excellent FBR. I think you've remarked on it yourself.
Ah, you didn't bite. I couldn't find GOM, so I thought you'd query FBR -- female bottom recognition.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 20 Sep 2013, 16:34
I sussed it out.  GOM is old from this forum - Grumpy Old Man. 


Right, Reiver?   :-D



You'd be hard put to find UBMEOD, too!  But I'll let you try before I tell you   :-P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: CrowFairy on 20 Sep 2013, 18:04
A bit of clever Googling will reveal the answer. :) (Though I'd seen it once long ago because the term popped up around when I started reading QC. It might have been around before that, but the definition I found was from around the same time.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 Sep 2013, 18:12
fetal hedgehog position

That registers very high on the pithy/insightful scale.  In three words, you summed up Faye's personality for the first 1600 strips or so. 

My hat's off to you. 

(http://myco-tek.org/images/smilies/hats_off.gif)

Faye said it first (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=350).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 20 Sep 2013, 18:16
Ah, but it's your combination that really gets the trauma-reaction across. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 20 Sep 2013, 20:55
GOM (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107050/)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 20 Sep 2013, 22:49
It was a pretty big thing for Claire, so you have to give her points for that.

Overcoming a fear is after all one of the most difficult things there is, no matter what it's a fear of.
That's true. Regardless of whether it's a phobia of some sort, or just a fear of change, it takes a GREAT deal to overcome that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 20 Sep 2013, 23:40
I sussed it out.  GOM is old from this forum - Grumpy Old Man. 


Right, Reiver?   :-D



You'd be hard put to find UBMEOD, too!  But I'll let you try before I tell you   :-P

I've been here long enough to remember this! Yay!
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 21 Sep 2013, 04:55
You'd be hard put to find UBMEOD, too!  But I'll let you try before I tell you   :-P
When I first started here, I used to read this as ubermod, as in a moderator who can smite you without warning (hey, I didn't know the local memes at the time). It took some reading to find
(click to show/hide)
.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 21 Sep 2013, 05:31
I wonder why Chinese? Delivery Man (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=761) didn't catch on.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Sep 2013, 06:21
ubermod
(Considers making this my custom title, realizes it's kind of redundant)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 21 Sep 2013, 07:13
Glad  I wasn't the only one who read "UBERMOD".


Does Tergon come on here anymore? Isn't he the primary custodian of the UBERMODS or something?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Sep 2013, 07:23
Who is this Tergon? I thought I was the Übermod.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 21 Sep 2013, 07:51
I thought pwhodges was the Übermod.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 21 Sep 2013, 08:08
He is.  Tergon was the person who coined UBMEOD, in reference to trying to "sweep back the tide of fanboys" that suddenly showed up in the massive shitstorm.  He's from Oz, and hasn't been in for quite a while...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Sep 2013, 08:59
I thought pwhodges was the Übermod.
He's the god warrior. He outranks the Übermod(s).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 21 Sep 2013, 09:29
Über und über und über nochmals ...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 21 Sep 2013, 13:51
I applied for the position of UBERMOD but I lack a Masters in Awesomtivity.   

Well, no matter.    Head of the Shipping Department is good enough for now.    I mean I can stuff two characters in a crate and FedEx them to Sandwich Island like no one else.    8-)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 21 Sep 2013, 14:27
Don't you have to have three characters in that crate to send to the Sandwich Islands? I thought that was a requirement.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Masterpiece on 21 Sep 2013, 14:52
Methods posts are so long they break the layout on my end. That makes him look like a ubermod to me.

(edit: they're so long because of his ridiculously long title)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Sep 2013, 15:06
I'll take it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 21 Sep 2013, 16:10
Don't you have to have three characters in that crate to send to the Sandwich Islands? I thought that was a requirement.

So any two character plus Tai?    :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 21 Sep 2013, 16:17
Well, being a shipping container, it might limit the choices somewhat more than just any two.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 21 Sep 2013, 16:19
I have a table-saw and lumber.   I can make a custom crate if I have to... or cut people in half.  It's all good.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 22 Sep 2013, 02:55
I'll take a half sandwich, thank you. 


And a cup of the soup, please. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 22 Sep 2013, 04:40
I'd offer some, Carl-E, but the war ladle (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2177) is currently in use.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 22 Sep 2013, 08:52
I can't think of a good poll, so someone else have at the new thread.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 23 Sep 2013, 06:23
And a cup of the soup, please.

I never knew you were THAT kinky, Carl.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 23 Sep 2013, 15:55
I wonder why Chinese? Delivery Man (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=761) didn't catch on.
He went home to Hebei (pron. Huh-bay (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/22/Zh-Hebei.ogg)), and works in his Dad's briquette business now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2535-2539 (16-20 September, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 23 Sep 2013, 17:18
I'll take a half sandwich, thank you. 


And a cup of the soup, please.

NO SOUP FOR YOU!